Last Laugh For Merck

Thursday, November 15th 2007

No need to rehash, but I will.

Merck recently anounced one of the biggest settlements in American civil history for those plantiffs suing it over the infamous COX-2 inhibitor Vioxx. When Merck first got sued their liability was estimated as high as $25 or 30 billion dollars, but Merck did surprisingly well with its promise to fight each suit individually.

Take that back - stunningly well.

But the legal fees and the uncertainty factor weighing on its stock and earnings made settling (finally) in Merck’s best interest. A few days ago I was sympathetic to their decision from a financial standpoint but bemoaned it based on the job they had done showing looney-bin plantiffs out to make a buck what life is all about.

But now, the Los Angeles Times has a story saying Merck may have gotten an even bigger last laugh than I initially suspected. On the surface, $5 billion dollars is a lot of money, but probably chump change when you consider the decades of legal fees they’re facing (and the occasional award charged to them). And of course its pocket change compared to what some suspected would be Merck’s original liability for Vioxx.

On top of the money though, could the plantiffs be getting an even shriller deal than originally reported?

The highly unusual agreement not only requires 85% of plaintiffs to agree before it can be finalized but also might unduly force some claimants to settle or risk losing their lawyer.

That’s because the deal includes highly unusual restrictions on plaintiffs’ lawyers. The settlement requires them to recommend the deal to all of their clients or none. In addition, lawyers must stop representing any clients who turn it down as long as they don’t violate ethics rules.

Settle or lose your lawyer.

“It’s always the clients’ decision to accept a settlement or not, and lawyers aren’t going to do anything that’s unethical,” he said. But “those considering this should know these are not easy cases to try in court.”

The emphasis is my own for the funniest line in the entire story. That’s not the point though. The point is, there is no major plantiff lawfirm who is going to let their clients walk away from this deal.


“Look The Settlement Is Just Like Cotton Candy. You Like Cotton Candy, Right?”

The biggest plantiff attorneys are going to be selling this settlement to their clients, like pie to a fat kid. You’re either going to take the deal or you’re going to end up some shaftball attorney representing you when you go to trial. Good luck getting a dime out of Merck represented by some guy working out the warehouse district.

 
 

Leave a comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

About The Blog


Medicine, healthcare policy, and random commentary from a medical student still on the naive side of the fence.
I'm a fourth year medical student in Texas.

I did my undergrad work in USC's School of Cinematic Arts. I have a Bachelors of Fine Arts in Writing for Screen & Television. I loved it, but a future of waiting tables and taking meetings with B-List producers was not for me.

This blog is ostensibly to discuss healthcare policy and maybe educate a few of my fellow medical students. But it will stray into current events, politics, and other science topics when they draw my interest



Other odd notes about me:

Disclaimer


Nothing on this website is to be taken as medical advice. Please seek counsel from a physician for any questions regarding your health.
Nothing on this website is to be taken as medical advice. I am not a physician. Please consult a physician concerning any health related questions.

This blog is entirely self funded. It accepts no advertising or other supporting revenue. The author has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Unless otherwise noted the media on this blog is under the copyright of the blog author, used under a Creative Common or free use license with appropriate accreditation or is in the public domain. If you believe images or video posted on this blog are copyrighted works used inappropriately please contact me.

Endorsements


"Please be more precise in your practice of medicine than you are in your blogging!"
- Mark Lanier

"Nice work."
- Commenter

"I really enjoy your blog. Thanks for taking the time to put it together."
- Rob Ebrahimi

"The guy who wrote this [blog] is an idiot."
- Commenter

Contact


Grand Rounds




To Host: granrounds@gmx.com

Posts & Links of Note

Recent Comments


bevis (on Kim Jong-Il(l)): "why did you take down the obama health plan post?…govt already threatening you?…and p.s. trojans suck..."
Chris H (on Texas Tort Reform): "Although I doubt it’s going to happen, long before we institute any kind of universal heath care, we need..."
Concierge (on Concierge Medicine 2.0): "This blog Is very informative , I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog . It helped me with..."
me (on Good To See Freedom Being Protected): "Truth is truly stranger than fiction. TSA apparently does not require US citizenship or education..."

Education Links


Guidelines & Research Admissions Residency Match Pathology Pharmacology Microbiology Physical Exam Anatomy & Embryology Neuroscience Histology Biochemistry & Cell Biology Physiology Medicine Pediatrics Surgery Obstetrics & Gynecology Radiology Psychiatry

Policy Links


Medical News Groups & Resources Tort Reform Covering The Uninsured Reports & Essays

Currently Reading

Currently Doing

Currently Viewing

[Complete Photos]

Blogroll


Medical Students Health Professionals Patients Health Policy Wonks Politics Space & Technology

Archives

Social Internet



Meta









Credits